Frequently Asked Questions¶
Won’t Kweb be slow relative to client-side web frameworks?¶
No, Kweb’s immediate events allows you to avoid any server communication delay by responding immediately to DOM-modifying events.
Kweb is designed to be efficient by default, minimizing both browser and server CPU/memory.
If you encounter a situation in which Kweb is slow please submit a bug.
Why risk my project on a framework I just heard of?¶
Picking a framework is stressful. Pick the wrong one and perhaps the company behind it goes out of business, meaning your entire app is now built on something obsolete. We’ve been there.
Somewhat unusually for a framework, rather than being tied to a company with paid contributors, Kweb is an individual passion project, with a growing number of voluntary contributors.
This may mean we lack the resource of salaried contributors, but we also avoid the dependence on the success of any one company, reducing long-term risk significantly.
Because of the powerful abstractions it’s built on, Kweb also has the advantage of simplicity (<5k loc). This makes it easier for people to contribute, and less code means fewer bugs.
That said, Kweb is still pre-1.0, one of the implications being that we can and will make breaking API changes, and new releases are quite frequent.
What’s the difference between Kweb and Vaadin?¶
Of all web frameworks we’re aware of, Vaadin is the closest in design and philosophy to Kweb. In many ways Kweb is a philosophical descendant of Vaadin. This makes Vaadin one of the most useful frameworks to compare Kweb to, as there are also very important differences:
- Kweb is far more lightweight than Vaadin. At the time of writing, kwebio/core is about 4,351 lines of code, while vaadin/framework is currently 502,398 lines of code, almost a 100:1 ratio!
- Vaadin doesn’t have any equivalent feature to Kweb’s immediate events, which has led to frequent complaints of sluggishness from Vaadin users because a server round-trip is required to update the DOM.
- Vaadin brought a more desktop-style of user interface to the web browser, but since then we’ve realized that users generally prefer their websites to look like websites.
- Kweb was built natively for Kotlin, and takes advantage of all of its language features like coroutines and the flexible DSL-like syntax. Because of this Kweb code can be a lot more concise, without sacrificing readability.
- In Vaadin’s favor, it has been a commercial product since 2006, it is extremely mature and has a vast developer ecosystem, while Kweb is still pre-1.0.
Is there a larger working example?¶
Yes, here is a simple todo list implementation which demonstrates many of Kweb’s features.
You can find a copy of this demo running here: http://demo.kweb.io:7659/
It’s running on a $50/month EC2 instance. Try visiting the same list URL in two different browser windows and notice how they synchronize in realtime.
What about templates?¶
Kweb replaces templates with something better - a typesafe HTML DSL embedded within a powerful programming language.
If you like you could separate out the code that interfaces directly to the DOM - this would be architecturally closer to a template-based approach, but we view it as a feature that this paradigm isn’t forced on the programmer.
How is “Kweb” pronounced?¶
One syllable, like “queue” and “web” smashed together.